
Answers to the question about how orthotics work, seems to be firmly headed down the Kinetic force pathway. Let me explain.
Kinematics - Describes positional change and change in motion.
Kinetics - Refers to the forces used to drive this change in motion.
Craig's research has been able to show that with orthotic use you are able to change the forces acting on a joint more effectively than changing the actual physical position.
|
The idea orthotics always produce large positional changes is often overdone in enthusiastic marketing such as this.
|
|
The foot has numerous small joints and their ranges of motion are relatively small, however the forces going through them are huge, for example when running these can be 2-3 times bodyweight.
This is why it makes sense that orthotics can alter forces without huge positional changes. By reducing specific forces this unloads the burden of the fatigued muscle, tendon or joint and allows pain free function.
Guiding of theses forces within the foot have specific implications for both shoe selection, orthotic prescription and patient selection.
↑ Top of page

Another reoccurring theme that is coming through in orthotic research is that clinical outcomes are often highly subject specific and variable (we have known this clinically for a while).
What does this mean?
Basically it means that orthotics work like magic for some people but they are not going to work for everyone or in all problems. This places increased emphasis on patient selection to optimise clinical outcomes. If we select appropriate candidates for orthotic use we are a lot more likely to have consistently better outcomes, and to us at Waikato Podiatry Clinic this is what we are all about.
How do we know who will respond well?
To help with patient selection and to improve patient outcomes there have been a number of new tests developed that focus on the forces and loading of the lower limb rather than objective appearance of the foot, eg high or low arch.
These include:
Supination Resistance, Rearfoot Axis, Subtalar Joint Axis of the foot, High gear / Low gear Analysis, Functional Foot Drop, Subtalar Joint Equilibrium, Preferred Motion Pathway, Plantar Pressure Mapping, Pathology Specific Prescribing and Tissue Stress Model, Functional Foot Typing.
↑ Top of page

Plantar Pressure Mapping:
While on the topic of forces, plantar pressure mapping is one way of determining where force is travelling through the foot in a dynamic situation.
How reliable is this information and how should it be used?
There are a number of systems used to take impressions of the different forces underneath the foot.
This can be very helpful in a clinical situation, however it is important to realise that there is a huge amount of variability produced in a normal gait cycle and it is suggested that the most accurate way of capturing relevant information is through the "in-shoe f-scan systems" (a small innersole with sensors that fits inside the shoe).
Unfortunately these systems can cost between $35,000 to $90,000. If the force platform systems are to be used that are not in-shoe then there needs to be a program that is able to integrate up to 6-8 different gait samples per foot to be able to come up with the typical average gait pattern. A single one-off pressure map is not an accurate representation of how the foot will function and can sometimes be misleading.

Osteoarthritis (OA) affects 30% of people over the age of 65 years. High external knee adduction alignment is one of the major risk factors for medial compartment OA and is significant predictor of the rate of OA progression. On normal walking, ground reaction forces pass inside the joint line centre and tend to compress this medial section.
Initially this may start as a valgus knee positioning then as the medial cartilage advances further the knee adopts a more and more varus knee positioning (see picture), hence the narrowing of the medial compartment secondary to the OA wear. You will have all seen people with knees of this particular shape.
There is currently a lot of research directed at lateral wedging and the positive effects it can produce in these cases. Several case study reports show a decrease in pain reduction by 53-82%. A paper Craig was involved in showed the pain and function scale reduced by 69% - 72% at three months post intervention. Unfortunately the four randomised control trials on this posting are conflicting in their outcomes probably because the length of the lateral wedges is not uniform with all studies.
Again in keeping with the theme of this newsletter there were more kinetic changes than kinematic changes and the fact that patient selection is vital to good outcomes! i.e. Several Rheumatology associations have included lateral posting in their standard guidelines for OA treatment.
↑ Top of page

With the onset of Rugby and with the grounds being as firm as they are this provides a great opportunity for players to use the current ASICS Lethal Rugby Boot.
(Gadde et al). "Cinical Journal of Sports Medicine" Vol 14, No.2 March 2004 identified that only lack of ankle dorsiflexion measured in the lunge test weightbearing position was significantly associated with lower limb injury for their group of 148 Australian Football players. It is this and similar running shoe research that makes the small raise (positive pitch) in the back of the ASICS lethal such an important innovation.
Despite what we now know about the importance of retaining a positive pitch in sports shoes, it is still concerning the number of rugby boots that are on the market that don't do this.
Fortunately some do - such as the ASICS Lethal.
Thanks to Asics and Smiths Sports Shoes Hamilton for their continued suport of PodiEtry News.
Kind regards,
Andrew Jones
Waikato Podiatry
email: andrew@waikatopodiatry.co.nz
phone: 07 838 0003
web: www.waikatopodiatry.co.nz

|